An Officer of the Contract? The Delicate Position of the Contract Administrator

Accessing papers

If you are logged in as a member or a registered academic, you will see a link to download the paper for FREE. The link is just above the Add to Cart button.

If you wish to purchase the paper, you must be logged in first (click here to log in, or click here to register). You will then see the Add to Cart button. You may also have a choice of preferred format if both are available - PDF download costs £3, printed version costs £7.50 inc postage. Choosing one or the other changes the price displayed.

When you are ready to check out, use the 'View basket' link in the top left of the website.

Professor Anthony Lavers 

May 2020

A paper presented to the Society of Construction Law at a meeting in London on 3rd March 2020

This paper examines the potential liability of a professional appointed to administer a construction or engineering contract. The paper first considers the liability implications of particular functions of a contract administrator, namely the supervision duty, and in particular the historical move from ‘supervision’ to ‘inspection’, and the issue of the final certificate. The author examines the wider question of how a contract administrator is exposed to the risk of being sued, following the lines of authority leading up to the decisions in Sutcliffe v Thackrah and Pacific Associates v Baxter and their effect on subsequent cases. The paper goes on explore other potential forms of liability facing a contract administrator: liability to a lender for negligent certification, liability for negligent advice to a third party, liability for injury to the work-force and liability to the contractor in the tort of deceit.

Introduction – 1. Scope of services: The supervision v inspection issue – a) A century of supervision – b) A change of direction – c) The modern era – d) The continued significance of the supervision/inspection issue – 2. The final certificate – 3. The consequence of status: the wider exposure of the contract administrator – a) How it was: the early cases – The first line of authority – The second line of authority – b) 75 years of quasi-arbitral status – c) The end of immunity – d) The modern era: the development of the law since Sutcliffe v Thackrah – e) Other possible forms of liability – Conclusions 

The author: Anthony Lavers is Counsel in the London office of White & Case LLP and Visiting Professor of Law at King’s College, London. He is a former Chair of the Society of Construction Law.

Text: 20 pages

Paper number: 
224
May 2020 printed and online, 1.1MB
£3.00

Our papers

The Society has published nearly 400 papers since 1984. Some are published both in hard copy and electronically (numbered), others in electronic format only (number prefixed 'D'). The hard copy papers can be purchased (except those marked with an asterisk which are no longer available). They are all also available as PDF files to download.

Those available as downloads can be accessed free by members and registered academics (students and staff) - if logged in, they will see a link to the file just above the Add to Cart button on each paper's page. Others can purchase the PDF file for a cost of £3.00. 

For further instructions on downloading, click here. The PDF file will only open on your computer if you have Adobe Acrobat installed (to obtain a free copy, click here). To save the paper to your computer, choose the 'save' icon on the Acrobat toolbar before opening the paper.

For personal use only

The papers on this website are for use by SCL members (and those who pay for them) only, and papers may be downloaded, printed and/or otherwise retained for that purpose only by members of the SCL (and those who purchase them).  The availability of all papers past and present represents a significant benefit to members of SCL and wider dissemination of SCL papers dilutes that to the detriment of the membership.  Further and more importantly, copyright in the papers belongs jointly to the writers of the paper and to the SCL, and the SCL is not therefore in a position to provide any wider licence.  Accordingly the SCL asks members and those who purchase papers not to disseminate papers more widely than their licence allows (e.g. by posting them on internal legal resource intranet databases and the like). 

Feedback